遺忘權的意思、翻譯和例句

是什麼意思

「遺忘權」是指個人有權要求刪除或隱藏其在網路上或其他地方的個人資訊,以保護隱私和個人資料安全。這一概念在數位時代越來越受到重視,尤其是在社交媒體和數據收集普遍的背景下。遺忘權的實施可以幫助個人控制自己的數據,避免不必要的曝光或負面影響。

依照不同程度的英文解釋

  1. The right to ask for your information to be removed.
  2. The ability to delete personal data.
  3. A request to erase information about someone.
  4. The right to have personal information taken down.
  5. A legal concept allowing individuals to erase their data.
  6. A privacy right that enables individuals to request the deletion of their personal information.
  7. A principle that protects individuals from having their past data remain publicly accessible.
  8. A legal framework ensuring individuals can control their digital footprint.
  9. A legislative right that empowers individuals to remove their personal data from public access.
  10. A legal entitlement that allows individuals to request the removal of their online information.

相關英文單字或片語的差別與用法

1:Right to be Forgotten

用法:

這是一個法律概念,主要源於歐盟的隱私法,允許個人要求刪除其過去的數據。這一權利旨在保護個人的隱私,特別是在互聯網上,當人們的舊信息可能影響他們的生活時。

例句及翻譯:

例句 1:

根據歐盟法律,個人有權要求被遺忘。

Under EU law, individuals have the right to be forgotten.

例句 2:

他申請了被遺忘的權利,要求刪除不再相關的舊資料。

He applied for the right to be forgotten, requesting the deletion of outdated information.

例句 3:

這項法律賦予用戶更大的控制權。

This law gives users greater control over their personal data.

2:Data Erasure Right

用法:

這個術語通常與遺忘權互換使用,指的是個人要求刪除其個人數據的權利。這一權利在數位隱私和數據保護的討論中非常重要。

例句及翻譯:

例句 1:

數據刪除權是保護個人隱私的重要工具。

The data erasure right is an important tool for protecting personal privacy.

例句 2:

用戶必須被告知他們擁有數據刪除的權利。

Users must be informed that they have the right to data erasure.

例句 3:

這家公司遵循數據刪除權的規定。

This company complies with the regulations regarding the data erasure right.

3:Privacy Right

用法:

這是一個更廣泛的術語,涵蓋了個人控制其私密資訊的權利,包括遺忘權。隨著數位科技的發展,個人隱私權的保障變得越來越重要。

例句及翻譯:

例句 1:

隱私權是每個人的基本權利。

The privacy right is a fundamental right for everyone.

例句 2:

在數位時代,隱私權的保護變得尤為重要。

In the digital age, the protection of privacy rights has become especially important.

例句 3:

她的隱私權受到侵犯,導致她要求刪除某些信息。

Her privacy right was violated, prompting her to request the deletion of certain information.